Price, Sherry A.2017-12-062017-12-062016-12-31https://laurentian.scholaris.ca/handle/10219/2845Hoarding has been estimated to affect 2 to 5 percent of the population. There are considerable health and safety implications for those who hoard, others living with them, and for the community. For this reason, public health inspectors (PHIs) respond to situations involving vulnerable individuals living in these potentially adverse housing situations. Earlier research found that PHIs responding to these housing health hazards face many challenges in the remediation of these conditions including client health, structural factors, and policy issues. The purpose of this case study, approached from a social constructionist perspective, is to further explore the challenges in remediation of compromised housing health hazards in hoarding situations. The study included PHI’s documented reports of 40 cases referred to them between 2013 and 2015 as well as field observations and semi-structured interviews with an individual who hoards, his family, members of agencies involved with this case, and PHIs who respond to hoarding cases. This data is part of a larger two-year case study examining an Environmental Health Division’s response to housing health hazards in vulnerable populations. There were significant challenges in the remediation of hoarding. Client factors such as advancing age, infirmity, living alone, and lack of formal and informal supports hampered resolution of cases as did lack of training for PHIs about hoarding and its psychological ramifications. The lack of coordination of services within the City of Greater Sudbury, the magnitude of the cleanup required, and the chronic nature of hoarding also posed difficulties. The creation of a coalition to provide a more comprehensive response to hoarding is required to support this vulnerable population.enhoardingself neglectpublic healthsocial constructionThesis